Papers for
audio restoration engineers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Orchestral historical music restoration improves with latent space models
End-to-End Historical Music Restoration in Latent Space
Abstract: Historical music restoration (HMR) has almost exclusively focused on constrained problems such as Super-Resolution or the restoration of solo pieces, under-exploring the general task of restoring orchestral historical music, which has multiple instruments. This under-exploration is largely because the HMR domain, early-20th-century recordings, has no pre-degradation ground-truth pairs, making the restoration task unsupervised and more challenging. This paper presents a supervised end-to-end orchestral HMR benchmark by exploring both the synthetic degradation functions and the end-to-end generative deep-learning restoration methods. We simulate the historical recording degradation chain more faithfully than prior work, which makes orchestral restoration into a tractable supervised problem. A latent flow-matching model trained on the resulting synthetic pairs outperforms existing HMR baselines on intrusive, non-intrusive, and subjective evaluations. We also curate and release a 9.3-hour license-free, unpaired, historical classical-music test set, along with code and audio demos.
Vinyl defect detector improves repair decision accuracy with two-stage signal analysis
Signal-Informed Temporal Routing for Vinyl Defect Regime Detection
Abstract: Vinyl restoration systems must distinguish isolated clicks, short bursts, dense crackle, and overlapping damage before selecting a repair operation. We present a lightweight two-stage detector in which signal-informed sparse, burst, and dense experts produce complementary defect evidence, and a temporal backend converts that evidence into stable repair regimes. The backend factors the five-way decision hierarchically, applies a validation-only mixed regime gate, and decodes with validation-selected transition penalties that outperform a maximum-likelihood transition matrix on the same emissions. On a source-separated synthetic benchmark of 597 non-overlapping 15 s excerpts drawn from 21 recordings, the held-out system reaches 0.730 pooled five-class macro F1 (95% CI 0.694-0.761), an improvement of 0.043 over a flat frame-level router (paired bootstrap p=0.001). Clean and dense frames are highly reliable, while sparse, burst, and mixed frames remain far more ambiguous.