astronomy data analysts

Abstract: Scientific imaging data involving medical (e.g., 3D radiographic, microscopic images) and astronomical sensors pose different challenges from natural images. One key challenge is that these datasets are often orders of magnitude larger than natural images. Efficient training and inference on such data is challenging due to the increased hardware requirements, often needing bespoke solutions. Moreover, the relevant objects such as tumors and astronomical phenomena are sparsely distributed with respect to the background information. Standard efficiency techniques like quantization and pruning apply uniform scaling of all regions, potentially compromising the precision/fidelity of predictions. Thus, efficient methods that reduce computational requirements without losing resolution for relevant parts of the data and with uncertainty estimates on predictions are essential. We present \textit{Conformal Adaptation} with risk guarantees for uncertainty-aware sparse computations. Our formalism is general, spanning dense pixel-level classification and regression tasks where hierarchical models predict at low resolution, certify the signal using conformal risk control, and refine the certified predictions. We benchmark our method on multiple tasks such as 3D medical image segmentation, 2D galaxy flux prediction, and 1D calcium spike rate prediction, achieving $2.5$--$72\times$ wall-clock speedup across the various tasks, including on commodity CPUs.

Abstract: Astronomical maps made with different tracers are not expected to have identical morphology. Excitation, optical depth, chemistry, radiation, and ISM phase alter the response of a tracer, and the resulting differences can depend on both position and spatial scale. We propose scale-vector alignment, a scale-aware method based on Constrained Diffusion Decomposition (CDD). CDD decomposes an image into localized scale components; at each position, their amplitudes define a scale vector that describes how the measured intensity is distributed over spatial scale. We define the pixel-wise similarity $\Spix(x,y)$ as the normalized alignment of two local scale vectors. The normalization removes the overall amplitude, so $\Spix$ compares relative scale composition rather than absolute flux. We also define the scale-wise similarity $\Sscale(l)$ by comparing the two CDD component maps at each spatial scale. Spatial shifts are used to construct an empirical shifted reference distribution for $\Spix$. In Orion~A, the tracer with the highest similarity to the dust-derived column-density map changes from $^{12}$CO to $^{13}$CO to C$^{18}$O toward higher column density. In NGC~6334I(N), the line--continuum similarity decreases locally around the brightest compact structures, where radiative-transfer effects can alter the observed line morphology. In NGC~3627, CO is most similar to 21~$μ$m emission, and $\Sscale$ reaches its maximum at an intermediate sub-kpc scale. The method measures where two tracers have similar multiscale structure and at which scales their spatial distributions agree. The implementation is publicly available at https://github.com/meng-ke/Scale-Vector-Alignment.