Papers for

aquatic robotics developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Low fidelity simulator enables robotic fish control in real water

All You Need Is Low Fidelity: Zero-Shot Sim-to-Real of Learned Robotic Fish Control

Abstract: Complex tasks for underwater robots remain limited by the capabilities of their controllers. Learning a better one for a soft, underactuated robotic fish trades simulator cost against fidelity. We show that an intentionally low-fidelity simulator is enough: a stateless, quasi-steady fluid model with no wake and no added-mass history suffices to learn a \emph{general}, closed-loop controller that transfers to hardware without tuning. Our platform is a soft, single-motor, tendon-driven fish whose policy observes only what the hardware can measure. A staged pipeline grounds the simulator in two independent identifications, fixing the tail dynamics and a stateless fluid model; the policy then acts through a band-limited rhythmic trajectory generator rather than commanding the tail directly. Deployed unchanged in an outdoor pool, a single policy performs closed-loop target reaching, disturbance rejection, and out-of-distribution target acquisition and tracking. The transfer rests on the constraint rather than the fidelity: the generator cannot leave the band over which the fluid was identified. This raises the question of how much of the physics can reside in the controller rather than in the simulator.

Tue 29 SeptRobotics
The gist
Controlling underwater robots like robotic fish is usually very hard because simulating water movement accurately takes a lot of computer power. The authors show that a very simple simulator with rough water physics is enough to teach a robotic fish how to swim and follow targets. Their robot uses only simple sensors and runs the same control program in a real pool without any changes. This approach suggests you don’t need perfect simulation to control underwater robots well.
Open → 2609.36993v1

Fish school behavior explained by position and exploration combined

Positional choice and robust collective behavior in fish schools: biohybrid experiments and modeling

Abstract: Collective behavior of fish schools is usually modeled on the assumption that each individual follows specific rules of motion that depend on its position and velocity relative to its neighbors. Although these models reproduce many schooling patterns observed in nature, it remains unclear whether the assumed rules are realistic at the individual level. To address this question, we first analyzed a set of experiments in which a live fish interacted with four moving robotic fish in a tank, and measured the time it spent in each position relative to the robots. We then simulated this experiment, replacing the fish with an agent, and assessed the extent to which classical models agree with the experimental observations. An extensive exploration of the parameter space showed that these models closely matched the experimental observations, with a very specific choice of parameters. However, they were highly sensitive to the parameter values: a minor perturbation caused them to fail completely. To resolve this, we propose a new model that incorporates an additional exploratory term characterizing the agent's positional preference at every moment. This model proved robust to small errors in the parameters while successfully replicating the experiments. Furthermore, when generalised to multiple fish, the model reproduced schooling behaviour and common schooling patterns, while also exhibiting exploratory behaviour at both the individual and the school level. This shows that social cohesion coexists with individual exploratory behaviour, and that realistic models of collective behaviour should account for both social interactions and this exploratory component.

Mon 28 SeptMultiagent Systems
The gist
Fish swim together in groups by following simple rules about where their neighbors are and how they move. The authors studied how a real fish behaved when swimming near robotic fish and then tested whether computer models could match this behavior. They found that classic models needed very precise settings to work, but by adding a factor for the fish’s own exploration, their new model was more realistic and stable. This improved model not only matched individual behavior better but also showed how groups of fish can stay together while still allowing for individual freedom to explore.
Open → 2609.35554v1

Coralscapesv2 dataset boosts coral reef image analysis with fine detail

CoralscapesV2: Panoptic and Fine-Grained Visual Scene Understanding in Coral Reefs

Abstract: In order to design conservation and restoration strategies to counter the global decline of coral reefs, ecological monitoring of reefs needs to be scaled up dramatically. Computer vision methods are increasingly used to tackle the vast amount of data: as the paradigm of data collection in reefs shifts from highly standardized and constrained survey images to unconstrained imagery on scalable platforms, it is necessary to design machine learning methods that help to get a fine-grained understanding of reefs from general-purpose reef imagery. This paper provides CoralscapesV2, an extension of the Coralscapes dataset for general-purpose visual scene understanding in reefs. CoralscapesV2 increases the dataset size, scope, label completeness and quality for semantic segmentation, and extends the number of classes from 39 to 95 fine-grained visual categories. Furthermore, CoralscapesV2 provides 65k exhaustive fish instance mask annotations, meticulously annotated to completeness by using the video, revealing that annotation of fish based on only static images is insufficient. CoralscapesV2 is the first dataset for panoptic segmentation in coral reefs, capturing a wide range of scenarios in the wild, posing a challenging benchmark for contemporary semantic segmentation and instance segmentation models. CoralscapesV2 is an important step towards general-purpose panoptic segmentation in coral reefs, which has substantial implications for scaling up coral reef monitoring, as it can be employed in a wide range of applications from benthic cover mapping from robot or handheld videos to designing methods for automated quantification and understanding of fish behavior and fish-reef interactions.

Fri 11 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Coral reefs are declining worldwide, and monitoring them requires looking closely at many reef pictures. The authors created CoralscapesV2, a large and detailed image dataset that helps computers identify many kinds of coral and fish in reef photos and videos. It includes more types of coral and fish than before and uses video frames to label fish more completely. This dataset helps improve computer tools that can analyze reefs more accurately and in different real-world settings.
Open → 2609.12826v1