Papers for

antenna array designers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Channels rotate backpropagation gradients causing errors in training

Coherent but Discordant: Rotate, Don't Invert, to Backpropagate Through an Aging Channel

Abstract: A channel can be almost perfectly coherent and still teach a transmitter the wrong direction. In physical ("over-the-air") backpropagation, the receiver sends its loss gradient back through the reciprocal channel; when the terminal moves in between, mobility does not merely add noise to the returned gradient, it rotates it. Under a scalar conditional mean model the rotation is set by the phase of the temporal correlation, so coherence, which measures only its magnitude, is the wrong ruler: in simulation, channels with absolute value of rho greater than 0.9 drive uncorrected training to 51.7% accuracy, while phase correction restores 92.5%. Arrays add a twist. Near zeros of the trace correlation, scalar correction fails even with rho known exactly, yet most of the information is still there: noise has moved it onto neighbouring antennas. Re-indexing the ports by the displacement, with zero digital feedback, recovers the lost performance in simulation, and so does rotating the returned seed with the unitary polar factor of the conditional mean operator, never inverting it; aligning each antenna's phase with its own past makes things worse. An exact array identity explains all three. The lesson fits in one line: correct the rotation, not the stretch.

Fri 16 OctInformation Theory
The gist
When sending signals through wireless channels that change over time, the usual way of sending feedback signals back to improve transmission can get confused. The problem is not just noise but a rotation that twists the feedback information, causing the system to learn the wrong things. The paper shows that fixing this rotation—by turning feedback information the right way rather than flipping or stretching it—greatly improves learning accuracy even for complex antenna arrays. The authors explain this phenomenon and how to correct it with simple mathematical steps.
Open → 2610.23137v1

Wideband terahertz links face beam squint and phase control limits

Beam Squint and Aperture--Bandwidth Limitations in Wideband RIS-Assisted THz Links

Abstract: This paper analyzes the ergodic rate of a wideband reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-assisted terahertz link under beam squint and finite-resolution phase control. Independent Rayleigh fading on the two RIS-assisted hops produces double-Rayleigh cascaded amplitudes. Exact second- and fourth-order channel moments are derived by incorporating the frequency-dependent array response and phase-quantization errors. Moment matching then provides a Gamma approximation for the received power on each subcarrier and a tractable closed-form approximation for the wideband ergodic rate. A first-null bandwidth approximation characterizes the aperture--bandwidth limitation of frequency-flat RIS control. Monte Carlo simulations validate the analytical framework.

Sat 12 SeptInformation TheoryNetworking and Internet Architecture
The gist
Wireless communication using terahertz frequencies can be improved with devices called reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS), which help direct signals. The authors studied how two problems—beam squint, where the signal direction shifts with frequency, and limited precision in controlling signal phases—affect performance. They developed mathematical formulas to predict signal strength and data rates across different frequencies. Their work helps understand limits on how well RIS can control wide frequency ranges in these systems.
Open → 2609.14037v1