Papers for
algorithm developers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Graphs without induced stars have bounded path independence number
Induced Forest Minor Theorem for Graphs Without an Induced Star
Abstract: Motivated by recent work on tree independence number, we study the path independence number of a graph $G$: the minimum integer $k$ such that there is a path decomposition of $G$ where each bag induces a graph with independence number at most $k$. We show that every graph excluding both an induced forest minor and an induced star has bounded path independence number. This characterises when a graph class that excludes an induced star has bounded path independence number while also partially resolving a conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milani{č}, Munaro, Štorgel and Wiederrecht (2024). Furthermore, we show that graphs excluding both an apex-forest induced minor and an induced star have bounded tree independence number. As a consequence, for every fixed apex-forest $H$ and integer $t$, there is a polynomial-time algorithm to test whether a $K_{1,t}$-induced-subgraph-free graph contains $H$ as an induced minor. Moreover, it follows that the Maximum Weight Independent Set problem, as well as several other NP-hard problems, can be solved in polynomial-time on $K_{1,t}$-induced-subgraph-free graphs that exclude $H$ as an induced minor.
Improved upper bound found for graphs avoiding six-node cycles
An Improved Upper Bound for the Turán Number of the Hexagon
Abstract: For a graph $F$, the Turán number $\operatorname{ex}(n,F)$ is the maximum number of edges in an $n$-vertex graph containing no copy of $F$. Determining the Turán numbers of even cycles is a central problem in extremal graph theory and remains open in general. For $C_6$, the best previous upper bound was due to Füredi, Naor, and Verstraëte [Advances in Mathematics, 2006], who proved that, for sufficiently large positive integer $n$, $$ \operatorname{ex}(n,C_6) \leq λn^{4/3}+O(n)<0.6272 n^{4/3}, $$ where $λ$ is the real root of $ 16λ^3-4λ^2+λ-3=0$. We improve this bound by showing that, for sufficiently large positive integer $n$, $$ \operatorname{ex}(n,C_6) \leq αn^{4/3}+O(n)<0.6144 n^{4/3}, $$ where $α$ is the unique real root of $ 4 α^{3} (3/2)^{1-1/(2α)} =1$ in the interval $(1/2,2/3)$.
Online inverse linear optimization improves with small-gradient skipping
Online Inverse Integer Linear Optimization via Small-Gradient Skipping: Constant Regret and Finite Mistakes
Abstract: In online inverse linear optimization, the learner predicts a weight at each round, observes the optimal action of the agent, and updates its prediction. In the general setting, the gap of $\log T$ between the regret upper bound $O(d \log T)$ and the lower bound $Ω(d)$ is unresolved (here $T$ is the total number of rounds and $d$ is the dimension). When the action set is M-convex, the regret is known to be bounded by $O(d \log d)$, but the method attaining it computes a center of gravity at every round. This paper therefore proposes Small-Gradient Skipping (SGS), a mechanism that skips the update at rounds without a mistake in the case where the correct action is uniformly separated from the other candidates, and applies it to online gradient descent, the online Newton step, and MetaGrad. The number of mistakes is then bounded, for all three, by a quantity independent of $T$; and for the online Newton step and for MetaGrad with SGS, the dimension dependence of the regret becomes $O(d^2)$ when the forward problem is an integer linear program, that is, the factor $\log T$ is removed. Moreover, when the action set is M-convex, the regret is bounded efficiently without computing a center of gravity.