Papers for

ai-powered customer support teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

LLaCO improves large language models with smarter text generation timing

LLaCO: Continuous Diffusion for Large Language Models with Competition-Aware Semantic Scheduling

Abstract: Continuous diffusion models have emerged as a promising non-autoregressive paradigm for text generation over continuous embedding spaces. Along the continuous trajectory, the residual token identity directly shapes the denoising objective. However, the geometric trajectory misaligns with temporal progression, triggering severe temporal compression. In this paper, we show that embedding norm decay causes Euclidean distance to yield spurious overtaking, indicating that token competition must be evaluated directionally. In this space, a candidate overtakes the source token only when the effective noise magnitude surpasses their semantic separation. We formalize these pairwise dynamics as the Competition Threshold Theory (CTT). Crucially, high-dimensional overtaking requires extreme noise levels, causing standard trajectories to concentrate identity decay into a narrow window near the noisy endpoint. To resolve this, we propose Semantic Retention Scheduling (SRS) to align time allocation with the progression of identity decay, and demonstrate that existing token identity metrics are fundamentally statistical aggregations of these pairwise crossings. Building on these theoretical insights, we introduce LLaCO, a generative framework powered by competition-aware semantic scheduling. LLaCO adapts a pretrained backbone to continuous representations via an embedding directional adapter and timestep-conditioned modulation. To operate within the directional space, LLaCO employs a spherical noising process formulated as a geodesic interpolation toward a mask-biased endpoint, eliminating norm decay while preserving accurate token competition. Guided by SRS, LLaCO reallocates the denoising trajectory proportionally to the logarithmic rank decay. Instantiated as an 8B model, LLaCO outperforms previous continuous diffusion baselines and rivals discrete diffusion models of comparable scale.

Fri 23 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Generating text with large language models can be tricky because the way words change over time doesn't always match how the model thinks about them. The authors found that measuring how words compete based on direction, not just distance, helps understand when one word should replace another during text generation. They created a method called Semantic Retention Scheduling, which times this replacement better along the generation path. Their new system, LLaCO, uses these ideas to produce more accurate text from continuous representations and performs well compared to existing methods.
Open → 2610.32604v1

Search agents improve query training with environment feedback

IGSD: Environment-Verified Hindsight Self-Distillation for Search Agents

Abstract: On-policy self-distillation densifies agent training without external teachers: a policy conditioned on privileged hindsight provides step-level guidance for its own unprivileged rollouts. For search agents, however, hindsight can make the teacher prefer a query that does not improve retrieval from the student's state. Existing methods either distill this preference directly or filter it with model-internal scores, but neither strategy verifies the query's executed retrieval consequence. We propose Information-Gain-Gated Self-Distillation (IGSD), which verifies on-policy token proposals with environment feedback before distilling them. Treating each query token as a micro-action, IGSD completes the teacher's token proposal and the student's sampled token into matched queries and executes both from the same failed state with the same retriever. Shared counterfactual controls account for query-conditioned shifts in answer likelihood, so their difference, the executed paired information gain, provides a relative utility contrast for the retrieved documents. IGSD uses this contrast as a positive-only soft weight for candidate-pair distillation, while leaving the GRPO objective unchanged and confining verification to training. Across seven single-hop and multi-hop QA benchmarks, IGSD reaches macro-average exact-match accuracies of 42.8% and 47.0% with 3B and 7B policies, respectively, without inference-time verification. These results support environment-verified hindsight as an effective approach to reliable action-level supervision for search agents.

Sat 26 SeptArtificial IntelligenceComputation and Language
The gist
Training search agents to find better answers is hard because they learn from their own attempts without someone else guiding them. The authors propose a method where the agent checks how useful a suggested search query is by actually running it and seeing if it helps find better information. This helps the agent learn which queries lead to better results, making its training more reliable. Their method works well on several question-answering tasks without needing extra checks when using the agent.
Open → 2609.32694v1

Contrastive modeling improves reasoning in multimodal language models

Beyond Surface Imitation: Contrastive Modeling for Reasoning Path Alignment in Multimodal In-Context Learning

Abstract: In-context learning (ICL) is widely used in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and achieves strong performance across a wide range of multimodal tasks. However, existing multimodal ICL methods often rely on surface level imitation of in-context demonstrations, making it difficult for MLLMs to align their responses with the reasoning path required by the given multimodal input. This limitation becomes more pronounced in complex multimodal tasks, thereby restricting further improvements in MLLM performance. To address this issue, we propose a new multimodal ICL framework that combines contrastive demonstration modeling with the self-refinement capability of MLLMs. Specifically, our framework reformulates each demonstration by explicitly contrasting a suboptimal response with a better response under the same input, together with a reasoning path that reveals how the response should be refined. This contrastive formulation makes the reasoning path toward the desired response more explicit and guides the MLLM beyond superficial imitation. Furthermore, because effective refinement depends on the current response, we introduce a response-conditioned retrieval mechanism to select demonstrations whose reasoning paths are more relevant to the current response. In addition, we use a lightweight alignment controller to predict response quality and determine whether further refinement is needed. Experiments on three types of multimodal tasks show that the proposed framework consistently improves MLLM performance, with particularly notable gains on visual question answering (VQA).

Wed 9 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can learn from examples to perform tasks involving images and text, but they often just copy example answers without understanding the reasoning behind them. The authors introduce a new method that teaches these models by contrasting bad and better answers alongside explanations of the reasoning process. This helps the models follow the correct thought process instead of just copying surface answers. Their approach also picks the most relevant examples for refining the model’s answers and knows when more improvement is needed, leading to better results especially in visual question answering.
Open → 2609.10177v1