Papers for
ai system security teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Hidden risks emerge when combining LoRA adapters in AI image generation
LoRango: It Takes Two LoRAs to Unlock Hidden Behaviors in Diffusion Models
Abstract: Users commonly combine multiple Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) adapters to personalize images with different subjects, styles, and visual attributes. Yet inspecting adapters individually does not establish the safety of their composition. We identify and characterize a pair-conditioned attack in text-to-image diffusion: individually useful and benign-appearing adapters redirect image generation when co-loaded with a specifically matched partner, whose identity serves as the trigger. We introduce LoRango to realize this attack through complementary Signature and Payload adapters. The Signature writes a pair-specific code into intermediate carrier representations, while the Payload uses code-selective responses and opposing signal/reference branches. These branches approximately cancel for standalone adapters and mismatched pairs; matched code-reader alignment breaks cancellation within native GEGLU blocks and releases the programmed action. Both adapters are exported as ordinary static LoRA files compatible with standard loaders, requiring no prompt trigger or base-pipeline modification. LoRango achieves matched-pair attack success rates of 97.9\% on SD v1.5 and 98.7\% on SDXL, compared with 2.8--4.6\% when implanted adapters are loaded individually. Further experiments evaluate pair selectivity, standalone fidelity, robustness to deployment variations, and applicability across denoiser architectures. These findings show that individual-adapter inspection is insufficient to assess the security of multi-LoRA personalization and motivate auditing adapter compositions.
Inference engines can be fingerprinted and exploited by AI models
Inference-Engine Fingerprinting Attacks are Practical: Exploring Model-Driven Environmental Discovery, Exploitation, and Escape
Abstract: Frontier AI models are rapidly gaining the ability to exploit vulnerabilities in complex pieces of software. The risk is not theoretical, as evidenced by recent sandbox escapes performed by frontier models at OpenAI and Anthropic. Discussions of how to sandbox inference stack components often focus on components other than the inference engine itself (e.g., network proxies or code execution environments). However, the inference engine is an attractive target for a misaligned model. For example, if a model can trigger exploits in that engine merely by generating specially-crafted output tokens, the model can initiate a multi-step, to-the-bare-metal exploit chain in the engine, without relying on vulnerabilities in other components of the inference stack, and without assistance from externally-provided, maliciously-crafted input tokens. In this paper, we show that a misaligned model can perform inference engine fingerprinting to determine the specific engine (e.g., vLLM, SGLang) which executes the model. Once the engine has been fingerprinted, the model can leverage engine-specific exploits to take control of the engine using only carefully-selected output tokens. We provide concrete examples of model fingerprints in five popular engines, and demonstrate how realistic agentic harnesses allow a model to leverage those fingerprints to identify the local engine. We also describe a proof-of-concept, to-the-bare-metal exploit chain that originates from a fingerprinted (and subsequently compromised) inference engine. We conclude by discussing several ways that inference engines could be changed to make fingerprinting attacks more difficult.