Papers for

ai research engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

AI and verification boost reliability of quantum open-source software

Perspective on AI and quantum open-source software

Abstract: Quantum open-source software provides essential infrastructure for quantum science, and artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping its capabilities and transforming its development. However, verifying quantum software at scale remains difficult, and AI-generated contributions can increase the workload of maintainers. In this Perspective, we examine verification as a central requirement for reliable AI-assisted quantum software development and research. We analyze public repositories, records covering 110 repositories from five annual quantum open-source hackathons that we organize, and responses from more than 1600 participants in a community survey. Our analysis connects limitations in automated verification with the review burden on quantum software maintainers. We propose verification practices and contribution standards that require contributors to support their changes with reproducible evidence for maintainer review. We also examine how quantum open-source software can provide infrastructure for AI-driven research whose results the community can independently verify and build upon. We maintain an open-source companion repository to support reproducibility and help projects adopt and refine these proposals. Together, these contributions help the quantum open-source software community translate advances in AI into reliable quantum research through reproducible verification.

Tue 27 OctSoftware Engineering
The gist
Quantum software is important for new quantum computers, but checking it for errors is very hard. The authors studied how artificial intelligence (AI) affects this software development and found that AI-generated code can make it harder for maintainers to review changes. They suggest ways to verify AI contributions by requiring clear, reproducible evidence to make reviews easier and results more trustworthy. The paper also explores how this verified software can support AI-powered quantum research that others can check and build on.
Open → 2610.38049v1

Poseidon creates many training environments for science AI agents

POSEIDON: Scaling Training Environments for Scientific Agents from Code Repositories

Abstract: Training environments remain a major bottleneck for agents in data-driven scientific discovery. Existing collections of executable and verifiable training environments are small, and their construction remains difficult to scale. To address this limitation, we introduce Poseidon, an automated pipeline for generating diverse, verifiable training environments from scientific code repositories at scale. From the same repository budget, Poseidon extracts nearly 10 times as many training environments as a prior approach by decomposing scientific workflows into four complementary task types: Reproduction, Subflow, Completion, and Correction, where each type targets a distinct capability for scientific research. A recursive improvement loop further refines failed candidates and recovers otherwise discarded environments. Using Poseidon, we construct Pearl, a collection of 97,659 executable and verifiable environments from 7,110 public repositories spanning 10 scientific disciplines. To the best of our knowledge, Pearl is the largest and most broadly multidisciplinary collection of scientific-agent training environments to date. Qwen3.5 models (9B, 27B, and 35B-A3B) trained on Pearl achieve consistent gains across six challenging scientific-agent benchmarks. Overall, the scale and diversity of Pearl offer opportunities for training scientific discovery agents.

Fri 23 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Training environments are places where AI agents learn to perform scientific tasks, but making many good environments is hard. The authors created Poseidon, a way to automatically generate a large number of these environments from publicly available scientific code. This method breaks down scientific workflows into four task types that train different skills and improves environments by fixing failures. Using Poseidon, they built Pearl, the largest collection of scientific training environments, which helped AI models improve on scientific challenges.
Open → 2610.32448v1

Formal library supports language generation in the limit research

GenLimitLib: A Formal Library for Language Generation in the Limit and AI-Assisted Mathematical Research

Abstract: We present GenLimitLib, a source-aligned Lean 4 library for language generation in the limit. Introduced by Kleinberg and Mullainathan at NeurIPS 2024, language generation in the limit studies a theoretical question motivated by LLMs: how to generate valid new strings from observed examples. This young and rapidly evolving field offers a natural testbed for studying large-scale formalization. GenLimitLib contains formal developments for 30 papers. It extracts shared definitions and reusable proof components while preserving paper-specific assumptions and statements, and records relationships across papers. In this way, GenLimitLib provides a concrete and structured view of the literature. We show through mathematical case studies and LLM experiments how our library can support both human mathematical research and AI-assisted research. Our Library: https://github.com/pengzhang91/generation-in-the-limit-lib.

Tue 29 SeptMachine LearningLogic in Computer Science
The gist
Language generation in the limit studies how to create new valid strings based on examples, inspired by large language models. The authors created GenLimitLib, a formal Lean 4 library that organizes and proves key concepts from 30 related research papers. This library helps researchers by structuring shared definitions and proofs while keeping each paper’s unique assumptions clear. The authors also show how their library supports both human and AI-assisted mathematical research through examples and experiments.
Open → 2609.36663v1

Modeling multiple future thoughts improves continuous reasoning accuracy

Next Thoughts Are Distributions: Generative Autoregressive Reasoning in the Latent Space

Abstract: Reasoning problems often admit multiple valid ways to proceed. Continuous reasoning promises to move computation beyond language tokens into a more compact latent space, but representing several plausible ways to think next remains difficult. We introduce Autoregressive Thought Flow (ATF), which models the next continuous thought as a multimodal distribution. A causal autoregressive model performs the reasoning computation, while a lightweight diffusion head generates a plausible next thought from the resulting condition. The sampled thought is fed back into the model, allowing continuous reasoning to unfold for a variable number of steps while preserving the pretrained backbone. Across mathematical reasoning tasks, ATF improves accuracy with compact latent traces and benefits from reinforcement learning and additional test-time thinking. Multi-sample evaluation shows broader solution coverage, indicating that its multimodal predictions capture useful diversity among reasoning paths. Our results suggest that continuous reasoning is more effective when multiple possible next thoughts remain available rather than being collapsed into a single prediction.

Sun 27 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Solving problems often involves many possible next steps, but computers usually pick only one next thought at a time. The authors present a method called Autoregressive Thought Flow that keeps track of many possible next thoughts as distributions in a compact space. This approach allows the system to explore different ways to solve problems continuously and improves performance on math reasoning tasks. It also benefits from learning methods that reward better thinking and can try multiple reasoning paths at test time for broader solutions.
Open → 2609.33271v1