ai model training teams

Abstract: Representation alignment speeds up diffusion transformer training by pulling an intermediate block of the model (student) toward features of a frozen pretrained encoder (teacher). Which teacher layer to align, and for how long, is still set by convention, and each alternative costs a training run. We find that alignment helps where the student cannot linearly recover the teacher's features, not where it already resembles them. Since a deep teacher layer is largely predictable from the one below, we isolate what each layer adds, its increment, and measure how much of it an unaligned student recovers. The student fills the teacher's hierarchy from the bottom up and stalls near the top, which we call hierarchy filling: even after 400K steps it recovers almost none of the deepest. The recoverability gap is the unrecovered share of an increment, read from one unaligned checkpoint. In short runs that each align one teacher layer at one block, the gap nearly reproduces their ranking by FID improvement, and CKA, a measure of feature similarity, largely reverses it. Representation Alignment and Recoverability Estimation (RARE) picks the teacher layer with the largest gap before training. During training, it tracks each token's remaining distance to that layer, the online counterpart of the gap, weights tokens by it, and phases out the loss once the average distance stops falling. With SiT-B/2 on ImageNet $256\times256$, RARE reaches an FID of 18.02 without guidance and 4.46 with it, ahead of seven alignment baselines including REPA, iREPA and HASTE. It also trains in 14% fewer GPU-hours than iREPA. Its FID stays below iREPA's across model scales, teachers, datasets and backbones.

Abstract: Self-evolving language models improve by generating tasks and learning from their own feedback, but adapting the task generator often requires a separate challenger-training loop. Can we generate tasks adapted to the current solver without explicitly training a challenger? We introduce \textbf{D}irect Self-\textbf{E}volving \textbf{O}ptimization (DEO), which replaces challenger parameter updates with solver-guided task sampling. The KL-regularized challenger objective defines an exponential tilt of a fixed base task distribution. DEO uses this distribution as a sampling target: a frozen LLM generates and mutates tasks, the solver scores them, and an approximate Metropolis selection rule refines the training pool. Only the solver is trained. Theoretically, for an idealized variant that samples exactly from the tilted distribution, and under regularity, local gradient-dominance, and initialization conditions, we show that DEO learns distributionally robust reasoning ability. In experiments, DEO achieves reasoning performance competitive with R-Zero while using over $50\%$ less wall-clock training time, and improves reasoning accuracy over a no-walk ablation. Replacing the task generator with a frozen API-only LLM further improves the local solver, illustrating a capability enabled by removing challenger training.

Abstract: Direct preference optimization DPO is a promising offline approach for aligning large language models (LLMs) due to its simplicity, computational efficiency, and implicit modeling of human preferences. Interestingly, iterative extensions of DPO have achieved stronger performance on academic benchmarks, raising two key questions: (i) Why do iterative methods generally outperform offline ones? (ii) Can their advantages be incorporated into offline alignment? To answer the first question, our controlled experiments reveal that the explicit preference model, additionally introduced in the iterative procedure, is a key factor behind its superiority over offline methods. This insight leads us to answer the second question affirmatively and propose Distilled Preference Probability Policy Optimization (DP3O), an effective and efficient offline alignment algorithm. DP3O first learns an explicit preference model using a helper class of LLMs and then distills its knowledge into policy optimization. Theoretically, we show that explicit preference modeling admits better estimation error control than implicit formulations, and that DP3O achieves a tighter generalization bound than hard-label DPO through variance reduction. Empirically, we evaluate DP3O on a wide range of chat-based and downstream tasks and show that it outperforms state-of-the-art offline methods, achieves performance comparable to iterative DPO, and reduces training time by about $42\%$, demonstrating both its effectiveness and efficiency.