Papers for

ai model engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Decoder cosine similarity struggles to predict model feature interactions

Where Decoder Cosine Similarity Fails for SAE Feature Flow Discovery

Abstract: Foundation models are increasingly adapted through fine-tuning, model editing, and alignment procedures while retaining previously acquired capabilities. Understanding the internal computations that support these adaptations is therefore becoming increasingly important for continual model evolution. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) provide interpretable feature dictionaries for residual-stream activations and sublayer outputs, but it remains unclear how state features and update features interact to produce downstream residual features. In this work, we focus on MLP updates as a first test case. We construct a transition atlas of triples $s_k + u_j \rightarrow t_\ell$, where a residual-state feature and an MLP-update feature jointly predict a target residual feature, and validate candidate triples by ablating the decoded update feature. In a 20M-token Pythia-160M $L_7 \rightarrow L_8$ run, we find 38,125 strong ablation-effect transitions, but 88.0% have both state-target and update-target decoder cosine similarity below 0.7. As a preliminary cross-model check, a run of 20M-token Gemma-3-4B $L_{21} \rightarrow L_{22}$ causally validates only the top 30,000 ranked candidate triples by ablating the decoded update feature, and 53.6% of strong-effect triples have both state-target and update-target decoder cosine similarity below 0.7. The Gemma result is directionally consistent with Pythia, but weaker, since update-target cosine recovers many of the strongest Gemma effects and the run is not a full-atlas causal validation. Ultimately, our results suggest that feature flow atlases can serve as diagnostics of representation-update mechanisms and thereby inform tools for steering model updates. Future work will validate more complex patterns across layers, models, and SAE families.

Fri 11 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
The paper looks at how parts of large AI models work together when they learn new things but keep old knowledge. The authors study small building blocks inside these models called sparse autoencoders and how they predict changes in the model’s internal signals. They find that a common technique called decoder cosine similarity often fails to spot important interactions between features that help the model update itself. This suggests that new tools are needed to better understand and guide how AI models change and learn over time.
Open 2609.12591v1

Fairness auditing made efficient for text to image AI models

Efficient Fairness Auditing Across Guidance Scales in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via Causal Abstraction

Abstract: Fairness auditing of text-to-image diffusion models often requires generating large numbers of images across sampling configurations, making comprehensive evaluation computationally expensive. We propose a causal-abstraction-based audit instrument for efficiently evaluating fairness under interventions on the classifier-free guidance scale. Given a fixed prompt and a target feature function, we represent the diffusion process as a low-level structural causal model and construct a corresponding high-level model over abstract denoising states. We characterize the projected causal structure, establish identifiability of the fairness-relevant interventional query, and provide sufficient conditions under which the high-level model preserves this query. A probabilistic transformer implements the high-level model as an amortized predictor of target-feature distributions across guidance scales. Experiments evaluate distributional fidelity, fairness-query accuracy, and computational efficiency. We present two auditing demonstrations: one using standard Stable Diffusion 1.5 and another using StayFair, a fairness-enhanced Stable Diffusion model, to examine their behavior across guidance scales.

Tue 8 SeptMachine LearningComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Checking if AI that creates images from text is fair requires making lots of pictures with different settings, which takes a lot of computer power. The authors created a smarter way to do this by simplifying the AI process into higher-level parts and using a special model to predict fairness outcomes across different settings. This method saves time and still gives accurate fairness checks. They tested it on popular image-generating AI models to see how fair they are under different conditions.
Open 2609.09486v1

Transformer models shrink channels to save computing and energy

Dense Structural Compression of Transformers via Gauge-Correct Channel Removal

Abstract: Inference energy per token drives the cost and carbon footprint of deployed transformers. It is dominated by dense matrix products that incur fused multiply-accumulate (FMA) operations and memory traffic. To reduce these computations while retaining dense tensors for high GPU throughput, we develop a methodology from first principles to adapt structural complexity during training to maximize inference utility per unit compute. Channel penalties drive entire tensor slices to zero to enable physical removal while preserving density and the network function. The natural approach, penalizing the norm of operator components acting through each channel, is provably destabilized by gauge freedom. We resolve this pathology with GaugeLasso: additive symmetric group-lasso penalties that recover a monotone function of product-norms when the network converges to gauge balance. Our equilibrium analysis enables per-channel calibration to correctly suppress slices that under-perform in inference utility per unit compute. Under adaptive pressure, the network reorganizes into depth-dependent structural profiles that can be far smaller than the architecture required to learn the task. On polynomial long division over $\mathbb{F}_{31}$, compute compresses from 148 to 255 times with perfect accuracy. On character-level language modeling, compressed models outperform the hand-designed baseline at equal FMA. On masked autoencoding, a compression trial exposes which axes were over-provisioned and which saturated, guiding a better second design. Compaction also accelerates training monotonically as the model progresses. Post-hoc pruning with the same utility ranking cannot reach these structures, showing that sustained pressure is central to discovery of efficient models. Retraining a discovered architecture recovers baseline quality on our statistical tasks, but fails on our exact algorithmic task.

Mon 7 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Transformers use a lot of computing power and energy because they do many big math operations. The authors found a way to make transformers smaller and faster by removing whole parts called channels during training without losing accuracy. They introduced a method called GaugeLasso that keeps the model stable while shrinking it. Their method made models work just as well but much faster and with less computing. This helps reduce energy use and cost when running AI models.
Open 2609.07264v1