ai accelerator developers

Abstract: Programming abstractions have traditionally been designed for humans, but code generation is increasingly performed by models and autonomous agents. We investigate abstractions for machine-driven programming through GPU and AI-accelerator kernel generation. High-level domain-specific languages (DSLs) simplify search by delegating implementation details to compilers, while lower-level representations provide finer-grained control at the cost of a larger and more complex search space. In this paper, we present TileCas, a unified, pluggable interface that enables coding agents to develop kernels across multiple editable abstraction levels. Rather than committing to a single representation, TileCas allows an agent to transfer and refine candidates across levels through Cross-Level Diagnosis, which maps correctness and performance feedback to actionable controls at different abstraction levels; Abstraction Scheduling, which selects both the candidate and representation from which subsequent refinement should proceed; and a Heterogeneous Search Tree, which preserves and revisits alternative search trajectories spanning multiple representations. We integrate TileCas with two code agents AKO and KDA, and evaluate both integrations on 50 end-to-end KernelBench Level 3 workloads across two accelerator platforms and two language models. Giving equal weight to the four accelerator-model configurations, AKO with TileCas achieves an arithmetic-mean speedup of $4.84\times$, compared with $3.75\times$ for the strongest evaluated baseline without TileCas, an improvement of 29.0%. Integrating the same interface with KDA improves its mean speedup by 69.2%, with gains in every configuration. These results show that allowing coding agents to navigate across programming abstractions can improve machine-driven software development and can be reused across different base workflows.

Abstract: Modern artificial intelligence is predominantly executed on computing architectures optimized for dense linear algebra. While this has enabled the success of contemporary neural networks and motivated compute-in-memory (CIM) architectures, a growing class of artificial intelligence (AI) workloads depends on associative retrieval, identifying stored information by content or similarity rather than by explicit memory addresses. Such operations are central to transformer attention, tree-based inference, genomic search, and other retrieval-intensive applications, yet remain inefficiently supported by conventional memory systems. In this Perspective, we argue that content-addressable memories (CAMs) provide a complementary hardware primitive for associative processing in AI. We review their ability to perform massively parallel in-memory matching, discuss how emerging memory technologies can improve density and energy efficiency, and identify hierarchical search, application-specific architectures, hardware-aware learning, and heterogeneous integration with CIM as key directions for scalable associative computing. Together, these developments suggest that associative retrieval should complement linear algebra as a foundational computing primitive for future AI systems.

Abstract: AI systems can now write and optimize production GPU kernels, but validating them remains an important challenge. Evaluating the kernel on a few random inputs and checking that its outputs match a trusted reference kernel within numeric tolerances is not sufficient: races can cause nondeterministic behavior that fails to manifest in tests, and numeric tolerances can hide bugs and cause false positives even after extensive calibration. To address this challenge, we present RESOLVE, which combines testing and formal verification to build a comprehensive kernel validation pipeline. It operates in three steps: First, it tests for nondeterminism using binary instrumentation that perturbs execution timing to expose races. Second, an agent rewrites the candidate and reference kernels to obtain "reduced-concurrency" versions that are simpler to analyze but still produce bitwise-identical outputs in all tests. Third, the reduced kernels are formally analyzed in the F*/Pulse framework and prove that they perform the same computation on real numbers. This sidesteps the need for numeric tolerances. We show that RESOLVE can validate a broad selection of kernels using KernelBench, and prove equivalence across fused GEMMs in three state-of-the-art frameworks and languages: CUTLASS, Triton, and Gluon. It also analyzes mega-kernels, notoriously difficult to validate, and finds four previously unreported issues, including two clear bugs. We show that agents can use RESOLVE to repair the issues, with minimal performance impact, highlighting that agents can optimize aggressively when they can rigorously check their results.