Papers for

agricultural technology teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

AI agents tested on yearlong experiments in simulated greenhouses

SlowLab: Benchmarking Autonomous AI Agents on a Year of Experiments They Cannot Undo

Abstract: AI agents are increasingly proposed as autonomous experimenters, yet the benchmarks that test them mostly offer cheap experiments that answer at once. Experiments in physical facilities are different: they take months, occupy scarce equipment and cannot be undone. We present SlowLab, a benchmark in which an agent runs a one-year campaign in four simulated greenhouse compartments on a site whose crop, facility and prices are hidden. The agent decides when to plant which climate policy, whether to stop a crop and which measurements to read while crops grow, and at the end recommends one policy, which a private evaluator scores in weather the agent never saw. In a preregistered study on 48 unseen sites, three low-cost language-model agents ended near a standard grower setting and clearly below a Bayesian-optimisation baseline that starts from that setting. They ran the facility as two synchronous batches, so measurements taken during the season never changed what they planted, and these measurements improved no method's result. Letting other methods re-read the evidence a campaign had collected did not yield significantly better recommendations, which points to where the models start and which experiments they try. Code is released under the MIT license.

Mon 26 OctArtificial IntelligenceMultiagent Systems
The gist
AI agents often run quick experiments, but real ones can take months and can't be undone. The authors created SlowLab, a test where AI runs a full year growing crops in simulated greenhouses with hidden conditions. The AI decides when to plant, adjust climate policies, and pick measurements over time. Compared to other methods, the tested AI agents didn’t outperform traditional approaches and couldn’t improve results by reanalyzing past data. This shows challenges in teaching AI to manage slow, complex experiments.
Open → 2610.34644v1

Outdoor aerial robots perform manipulation using onboard sensors and learning

Aerial Manipulation in the Wild with Onboard Perception, Policy Learning, and Whole-Body Control

Abstract: Aerial manipulation in outdoor environments remains challenging due to the simultaneous requirements of reliable state estimation, stable aerial motion, and precise manipulation under external disturbances. In this work, we present a real-world outdoor aerial manipulation framework that integrates imitation learning, onboard LiDAR-inertial state estimation, and whole-body model predictive control. A Diffusion Policy is trained from manipulation demonstrations to generate desired end-effector motions from onboard observations. These learned commands are executed by a whole-body MPC that jointly coordinates the aerial platform and manipulator to realize the desired end-effector trajectory. To eliminate reliance on external motion-capture infrastructure, the platform employs onboard LiDAR-inertial odometry for state estimation during outdoor operation. We validate the complete framework on a physical aerial manipulator and demonstrate successful execution of outdoor manipulation tasks. The experimental results show that demonstration-driven manipulation policies can be effectively integrated with onboard state estimation and model-based whole-body control to enable aerial manipulation beyond controlled indoor environments.

Thu 24 SeptRobotics
The gist
Doing tasks with flying robots outside is hard because they have to know exactly where they are, fly steadily, and move their arms precisely despite outside forces. The authors built a flying robot that uses its own sensors to figure out its position without extra equipment, learns how to move its arm from example demonstrations, and controls its whole body together to do tasks. They tested their system outdoors and showed it can handle manipulation tasks well in real-world conditions. This technology helps flying robots work better outside controlled labs.
Open → 2609.30521v1