Papers for

aerospace engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Balanced active subspaces improve control of complex systems

Balanced Active Subspaces for Optimal Control via Trajectory Optimization

Abstract: The curse of dimensionality associated with solving the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation for the value function remains a key obstacle for real-time optimal feedback control of high-dimensional nonlinear dynamical systems. This is especially severe in aerospace applications such as relaminarizing unsteady turbulent flows and recovering from aerodynamic stall where nonlinear dynamics play a significant role. We introduce Balanced Active Subspaces for Optimal Control (BASOC), a model reduction framework which seeks to find directions in state space along which the value function is most sensitive, and the distribution of states exhibits maximum variance along optimal trajectories. BASOC leverages trajectory optimization and the Pontryagin minimum principle to obtain state and co-state (value function gradient) data along locally optimal trajectories for constructing state and gradient covariance matrices. Balancing these matrices provides an oblique projection for approximating the value function, which can also be used to construct reduced-order models and surrogate feedback control laws. We show that for linear-quadratic optimal control problems, BASOC becomes equivalent to a snapshot method for initial condition balancing of the optimally controlled closed-loop realization. The framework is demonstrated on a nonlinear three-dimensional system where POD and balanced truncation are known to perform poorly, and on the nonlinear complex Ginzburg-Landau equation to demonstrate feasibility for larger-scale systems.

Mon 26 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Controlling complex systems with many variables is hard because traditional methods get too slow and complicated. The authors introduce Balanced Active Subspaces for Optimal Control (BASOC), a way to focus only on the most important directions that affect how well the system performs. They use data from optimal trajectories to simplify the problem, making it easier to design control strategies. Their method works better than some common techniques on tricky nonlinear systems.
Open → 2610.36342v1

Geometry aware neural model improves propeller flow prediction with limited data

FG-ConvNO: A Geometry-Aware Neural Operator for Propeller CFD Prediction

Abstract: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is essential in contemporary engineering design, yet it remains expensive to compute and can take thousands of CPU/GPU hours or more for a single high-fidelity simulation. Recent developments in machine learning for scientific modeling have led to powerful surrogate frameworks that can approximate flow fields and physical quantities by using a fraction of the computational cost. However, most of these methods require largescale homogeneous datasets or simple geometries, exhibiting severe generalization gaps when applied to complex and data-scarce configurations. To address this, we propose the Factorized Geometry Convolutional Neural Operator (FG-ConvNO) for robust geometry-aware propeller pressure prediction under limited training data. We introduce geometryaware encoding, efficient interpolation-based decoding, and auxiliary global quantity supervision. In addition, we incorporate DISCO blocks that use discrete continuous convolutions to make the model discretization agnostic. In our experiments, FG-ConvNO achieves the highest accuracy for both surface pressure and global thrust prediction on a procedurally generated propeller CFD dataset. Geometry-aware encoding and architectural simplification improve stability, while random vertex subsampling enhances robustness. Overall, adding geometric priors to grid-based convolutional operators reduces overfitting on complex propeller geometries and improves generalization in low-data regimes.

Sat 24 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Simulating airflow around complex objects like propellers is often very slow and costly. The authors present a new machine learning method that understands the shape of the propeller better, allowing it to predict pressure and thrust with less data and fewer errors. Their approach uses special math tricks to handle irregular shapes and data points, making predictions more accurate and stable. This helps engineers get faster results without running expensive simulations every time.
Open → 2610.33456v1

Deep reinforcement learning faces challenges for high-speed flow control

Glass-Box Deep Reinforcement Learning for High-Speed Flow Control

Abstract: Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is challenging long-held assumptions in active flow control. By learning directly from interaction with a flow, DRL agents can find actuation strategies for nonlinear, unsteady flows without explicit models, often exploiting mechanisms that classical control would not anticipate. High-speed flows are a demanding test of this promise: shocks, shock/boundary-layer interactions, transition, aerothermal loading and microsecond-scale dynamics strain both algorithms and hardware. Yet most demonstrations remain idealized, low-speed simulations with limited evidence of robustness, interpretability, transferability or experimental deployment. In this perspective, we examine what constrains DRL-based high-speed flow control, including compressible simulation cost and fidelity, data efficiency, sensing in extreme environments, reward design, explainability, and generalization across Mach and Reynolds number. We argue that these limits reflect a tension between data-driven optimization and the structured physics, constraints and uncertainties of real flows. We then highlight where DRL may go beyond conventional approaches: adaptive control of shock-induced separation and turbulent boundary layers, coordination of distributed actuators, and discovery of unconventional flow-manipulation mechanisms.The central challenge, however, is translating these capabilities into reliable technology, which will require validated compressible simulation environments, physics- and constraint-aware learning, robustness to off-design conditions and sensor degradation, real-time operation, hardware-in-the-loop and wind-tunnel validation, and credible pathways to safety and certification.

Mon 19 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Controlling fast-moving airflows, like those around jets or rockets, is really hard because the flows are complicated and change quickly. The authors discuss how a type of artificial intelligence called deep reinforcement learning could help control these flows by learning from experience, without needing detailed physical models. However, there are many obstacles to overcome, like making simulations more realistic, designing good feedback signals, and ensuring the learned control works safely in real-world conditions. The paper highlights both the promises and the current limits of this AI approach for managing high-speed airflows.
Open → 2610.27132v1

Adaptive prediction regions for complex shape data on curved spaces

Adaptive conformal prediction on the Grassmannian

Abstract: We introduce a conformal prediction framework for regression with Grassmann-valued responses. The proposed method constructs prediction regions in the form of metric balls directly on the Grassmann manifold, using basis-invariant geometric distances as non-conformity measures and scaling the corresponding non-conformity scores through a learned prediction difficulty estimator. This yields locally adaptive, input-dependent prediction regions that respect the underlying manifold geometry, while retaining the finite-sample marginal coverage guarantee of split conformal prediction under exchangeability. We evaluate several Grassmannian distance metrics and compare their prediction-region efficiency on synthetic benchmarks and an airfoil inverse shape-design problem. The results highlight the advantages of geometry-aware non-conformity scores, while local adaptation improves empirical coverage uniformity across prediction difficulty levels and, in strongly heteroscedastic settings, can substantially reduce prediction-region size while maintaining the target coverage.

Fri 16 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Sometimes, data represents complex shapes that live on curved spaces called Grassmann manifolds. The authors developed a method that makes predictions about these shapes while respecting their complex geometry. Their approach adapts to how difficult it is to make a prediction for each case, producing more accurate and reliable prediction zones. They tested this method on simulated data and a tricky airfoil design example, showing it better fits the data’s true shape and uncertainty.
Open → 2610.23508v1

Structural affinity improves 3D shape control with linked cages

Structural Affinity: An Algorithm for Coherent Cage-Based Shape Design

Abstract: Cage-based deformation (CBD) parametrises 3D geometry through a small set of control handles, effectively enabling a variety of tasks from animation and interactive modelling to tool-based co-design, neural deformation transfer, and aerodynamic shape optimization. Many optimization approaches relying on CBD employ regularisation strategies to reduce the distortion of the deformed mesh by encouraging smooth, regular cage deformations. These techniques offer soft guidance to an optimization algorithm towards desirable deformations, but compete with the task objective rather than changing the deformation parameterization itself. In this work we introduce Structural Affinity for CBD, an explicit regularisation method which enables smooth deformations through control cages by exploiting a two-cage structure to couple cage-handle motion directly. Structural Affinity precomputes an affinity matrix using mean-value coordinates, binding the inner control-cage to a coarser outer-cage. This matrix defines how much a cage handle displacement propagates to neighbouring handles which substantially decreases and often eliminates cage self-intersections, reduces mesh distortion, and adds linear overhead at deformation time. Across robotic control--morphology co-design, source-to-target neural deformation transfer, and aerodynamic wing shape optimization, Structural Affinity produces more regular deformations and substantially reduces reliance on hand-designed structural loss terms. We report consistent gains on three complementary diagnostics: the cotangent Laplacian, a proxy for surface smoothness; cage distortion, capturing whether control handles move coherently; and surface roughness, which measures undesirable oscillation in wing geometry.

Fri 16 OctMachine LearningGraphicsRobotics
The gist
Changing complex 3D shapes smoothly can be hard because simple control points might move in ways that distort the surface. This paper presents a way to link two layers of control cages so that moving one handle affects neighbors in a smooth and natural way. The authors’ method reduces weird distortions and tangled cages, making shape adjustments look better and easier to control. They tested it in areas like robotic design and wing shape optimization, showing it helps create nicer deformations without extra manual tuning.
Open → 2610.23173v1

Counting and generating manufacturable composite stacking sequences efficiently

Counting and Sampling Manufacturable Stacking Sequences

Abstract: Designing the stacking sequence of a composite laminate is a discrete optimisation problem: each ply takes one of a few orientations, each evaluation may cost a finite-element solve, and the design must obey manufacturing rules and design guidelines, which optimisers enforce by penalty, repair or rejection. We describe the admissible set exactly. The two manufacturing rules forbid a finite set of factors, so the sequences they admit form a regular language, recognised by an automaton that tracks the last orientation and the length of its run; balance and the ten per cent rule constrain the Parikh vector and are carried by a dynamic program over automaton state and counters. One table, polynomial in N, counts the admissible sequences without producing them, draws them uniformly, and tells whether a partial sequence can still be completed. We give pseudocode, exact counts for three orientation sets, closed-form ceilings on the composition, and four of the five single-rule entries a published table left uncomputed. At 48 plies, 99.8% of the nodes of a layer-wise search tree checking the rules locally have no admissible completion on eight orientations; the completion test removes them. A one-point crossover that cuts two admissible parents only where they share an automaton state and their child closes the counters returns admissible children by construction.

Fri 16 OctDiscrete MathematicsComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceFormal Languages and Automata Theory
The gist
Creating the order and orientation of layers in composite materials is tricky because of strict manufacturing rules and performance guidelines. The paper’s authors explain a precise way to represent all allowed layer sequences using a mathematical model called an automaton. This lets them count and pick valid sequences quickly without testing each one by trial and error. They also show how to check partial designs early to avoid impossible paths, improving design efficiency.
Open → 2610.23146v1

Model reduction method avoids snapping and enforces boundary conditions exactly

The Snapping Phenomenon and Boundary Enforcement in Model Reduction: Mechanisms and Mitigation

Abstract: Projection-based model order reduction mitigates the computational cost of high-fidelity parametric simulations but can suffer from the "snapping phenomenon", whereby a projection-based reduced-order model (PROM) rigidly latches onto a training snapshot, impairing parametric interpolation. Standard methods also struggle to enforce parameter-dependent boundary conditions without costly constraints or penalty schemes. This work proposes a tripartite taxonomy of snapping, distinguishing intrinsic, extrinsic, and numerical mechanisms. Focusing on intrinsic and numerical snapping, we introduce a unified framework based on a parameter-dependent shift vector. By embedding spatial transport into the state ansatz, the method enforces boundary conditions exactly, restores continuous parametric sensitivity, and eliminates snapshot latching in affine and regression-augmented PROMs without increasing online complexity. We establish the framework's mathematical foundations in the linear regime, showing how it overcomes test-space orthogonality blind spots. In nonlinear computational fluid dynamics, we identify the roles of boundary conditions, mesh grading, and discrete equation scaling in numerical snapping. We also show that formulation-toggling is an unreliable heuristic that can compromise near-field accuracy. Finally, we develop a field-theoretic realization using a spatially varying shift vector governed by a scaled Laplace equation. The approach is validated on structural and aerodynamic benchmarks, including viscous flow around a NACA airfoil and a three-dimensional NASA Common Research Model.

Thu 15 OctComputational Engineering, Finance, and Science
The gist
Complex computer simulations that depend on parameters can be sped up by creating simpler models, but these models often get stuck on certain training examples, making them less flexible. The authors identify different reasons why this 'snapping' happens and develop a new technique that includes a flexible spatial shift to prevent sticking and accurately apply boundary rules based on parameters. This approach keeps the model’s predictions smooth and accurate across different conditions without extra computational cost in use. They test their method on problems in fluid flow and structural engineering to show it works well.
Open → 2610.22103v1

Bayesian shape design improved using example-based parameter choices

Example-driven Parametrisations for Bayesian Shape Optimisation

Abstract: Bayesian optimisation is the natural tool for shape design when objectives are expensive and non-differentiable, but it needs a compact yet expressive parameterisation of the search space. Hand-crafting one is a complex endeavour requiring domain expertise, and often yields implicit infeasible regions, artificial bounds, and coupled, unordered coordinates. We instead learn the parameterisation from a collection of existing designs, applying principal component analysis to the deformations between shapes. The result is a linear, interpretable search space in which the number of components explicitly trades expressivity against dimensionality. Across aerofoils, wings, and radio-frequency cavities, spanning 2D geometry to 3D aerodynamics and electromagnetics, we show improved sample efficiency and the ability to explore beyond the confines of hand-crafted baselines.

Thu 8 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Designing shapes like airplane wings or radio parts is hard because testing new shapes can take a lot of time and resources. Bayesian optimisation helps find good shapes, but it needs a simple way to describe all possible shapes to search effectively. The authors show how to create this description automatically by learning from a collection of existing shapes, making the search more efficient and flexible. This method works for various shapes in two and three dimensions and lets designers explore better shapes faster.
Open → 2610.11984v1

Joint error metric evaluates cfd accuracy against wind tunnel data

A joint error metric for scoring CFD against wind tunnel data, scaled by the robust spread of the participants (AutoCFD5 Case 2)

Abstract: AutoCFD5 Case 2 compares the participants' CFD results with wind tunnel measurements of surface pressure, velocity profiles and force coefficients. To place each run on a diagram of error against computational cost, these quantities must be combined into one number. This note defines that number, the joint error. Following the practice of interlaboratory proficiency testing (ISO 13528), every deviation from the experiment is expressed in units of the spread of the participants' results at that point, estimated robustly with the standard's Algorithm A. The point-wise spreads are pooled into one scale per component, so that every measurement point carries equal weight within its component. The joint error is a fixed weighted sum of five component errors. The scales are computed once from all AutoCFD5 submissions received by 5 October 2026 and then frozen, so that scores are reproducible and comparable across workshops.

Thu 8 OctComputational Engineering, Finance, and Science
The gist
Comparing computer simulations of airflow with real wind tunnel experiments is tricky because they measure many things differently. The authors created a single combined score that fairly measures how close the simulations are to experiments across various data points. This score uses statistical methods to balance errors by how much variation exists among different simulation runs. It helps researchers and engineers objectively compare accuracy and computational effort of different simulations.
Open → 2610.11522v1

D-JEPA separates geometry from physics for better design modeling

D-JEPA: Design-Recoverable JEPA Representation with Swappable Physics Decoders

Abstract: Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) provide a framework for learning compact representations without directly reconstructing high-dimensional observations. However, in parameterized physical systems, learned representations can entangle geometry with operating conditions and task-specific physical responses, limiting their reuse across prediction tasks. We introduce D-JEPA (Design-recoverable JEPA), a geometry-centric JEPA that computes a compact representation from geometry alone and reuses it across operating conditions and physical response spaces through lightweight physics-specific decoders. An explicit design-recoverability objective encourages the geometry latent to preserve information about the underlying design variables, enabling the representation to support design analysis and optimization. We further identify a case-level collapse failure mode in which target representations become nearly invariant across distinct geometries despite low reconstruction error, and mitigate it using case-level variation constraints and auxiliary target reconstruction. Across four 3D aerodynamic, hydrodynamic, and structural benchmarks, D-JEPA maintains or improves full-field prediction accuracy while achieving near-perfect linear recoverability of design parameters. The frozen geometry representation can be reused at held-out operating conditions and transferred to a structural response task with fewer trainable parameters. Finally, the representation supports differentiable design optimization, with designs validated using high-fidelity CFD, preserving the predicted ranking of candidate designs. These results demonstrate that separating a reusable geometry representation from physics-specific prediction provides a practical representation for scientific surrogate modeling and design.

Sun 27 SeptMachine LearningArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Predicting how complex physical systems behave can be tricky because geometry and physical conditions often get mixed up in learned models. The authors introduce D-JEPA, an approach that focuses on representing geometry separately, so it can be reused across different physical situations. This lets the model better understand designs and even helps with optimizing them by keeping track of underlying design details. Their method works well on 3D problems like airflow and structural responses, improving accuracy and making design exploration easier.
Open → 2609.33110v1

Python framework enables coordinated optimization of complex systems

DistributedDesignOptimizer: A modular Python framework for Setup, Execution and Processing of Distributed Design Optimization

Abstract: Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) enables the application of optimization algorithms to complex engineered systems, ranging from aerospace and automotive to robotics and microelectronics. Such multi-component systems typically consist of coupled subsystems, each characterized by its own design variables, constraints and objectives. Without adequate coordination of these couplings, subsystems may be optimal in isolation while the overall system remains suboptimal or even infeasible. Distributed design optimization coordinates coupled subsystem optimization problems while allowing them to retain control over their local design variables. Although promising coordination methods exist, their application is hindered by the lack of a comprehensive software framework which supports intuitive problem definition, provides suitable distributed coordination algorithms, is modular and extensible, enables interactive (post-)processing, and supports the distributed computation of subsystem executions. This work derives requirements for such software, assesses existing frameworks against them, and introduces DistributedDesignOptimizer, an open-source Python framework to fill this gap.

Fri 25 SeptMathematical Software
The gist
Optimizing complex engineered systems is hard because different parts have their own goals that might conflict. The authors studied how to safely coordinate such parts so the whole system works better, not just each part. They created DistributedDesignOptimizer, a Python tool that helps define, run, and analyze these coordinated optimization tasks in a modular and flexible way. This tool supports running calculations for different parts in separate locations and makes it easier to try advanced coordination methods.
Open → 2609.31446v1

Piezoelectric energy harvesting compared using full and reduced aerodynamic models

Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting from a Pitch-Plunge Aerofoil in Compressible Flow, the Euler Full-Order Model, Strip Theory and the Reduced Models Compared

Abstract: A piezoelectric transducer embedded in a pitch-plunge aerofoil with a finite-mass trailingedge flap converts the limit-cycle oscillation that follows flutter into electrical power. The design findings for such a harvester have so far been obtained with incompressible strip theory, whose aerodynamic state is a handful of lag variables. Here the same section, the same transducer and the same test cases are coupled instead to the two-dimensional compressible Euler equations, giving a full-order model of twelve thousand states, and the two aerodynamic models are placed side by side on the flutter boundary, on the limit cycle and on the harvested power, with the strip-theory results compared against higher fidelity aerodynamic modelling provided by CFD. The degree of freedom carrying the transducer remains the first-order design variable, and the ranking of the mountings is unchanged and wider, while strip theory is found to under-predict the harvested power of the compressible section and to overstate the effect of the transducer on stability where the electrical time constant meets the flutter frequency. A nonlinear reduced model of four states, built on eigenvectors of the coupled Jacobian at the velocity of interest, reproduces the frequency of the cycle, its pitch amplitude, the transducer voltage and the mean power, and misstates the proportion of plunge to pitch in the orbit and its phase. That error is shown to be independent of the amplitude of the cycle and to survive enlargement of the basis, which places it in the retained subspace rather than in the order of the expansion, and suggests that such models should be judged on the shape of the orbit rather than on a single amplitude.

Wed 16 SeptComputational Engineering, Finance, and Science
The gist
Vibrations in airplane wing sections caused by airflow can be converted into electrical power using materials that generate electricity when stretched or squeezed, called piezoelectric transducers. The authors studied how well different mathematical models predict this energy harvesting, comparing a simpler approach called strip theory with a complex, detailed simulation based on fluid flow equations. They found that the simple model underestimates the power that could be generated and overestimates how much the device affects wing stability. They also tested a small, fast reduced model that approximates the complex behavior but found it has some persistent errors in capturing the motion details.
Open → 2609.18601v1

Metacognitive steering enables AI to control scientific reasoning processes

Metacognitive Steering: Learning the Structure of Scientific Judgment

Abstract: Long-horizon scientific discovery requires agents to alternate between exploration, disciplined execution, and critical reassessment as evidence changes. Current language models are trained primarily on the products of science and optimized using outcome-level signals, providing limited supervision for these process-level shifts in scientific judgment. We investigate whether such judgment can be recovered from scientist interaction traces and used to control the internal computation of a frozen frontier model. Using contrastive interventions collected during real scientific research, we identify a coordinated, low-dimensional control structure within Kimi 2.6, a trillion-parameter mixture-of-experts model. Residual analysis, attention-weight subspace alignment, and cross-layer singular value decomposition converge on a mid-depth control surface spanning key layers. We introduce Metacognitive Steering, an inference-time controller that reads the model's cognitive regime and dynamically composes layer-specific interventions for exploration, procedural convergence, or critical reassessment without modifying model parameters. Behavioral analyses show that this control produces more sustained exploration, explicit pruning, and evidence-responsive synthesis. We operationalize the method in Columbus-1, an autonomous research system that identified eight independently reproduced, attacker-reachable vulnerabilities in BlueZ and directed the design, simulation, and fabrication of a ten-foot rocket intended to land propulsively using non-throttleable solid motors. Together, these results show that process-level scientific judgment can provide supervision for interpretable, dynamic control over a model's reasoning strategy.

Mon 14 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Scientific discovery often requires exploring ideas, following strict methods, and rethinking conclusions as new evidence appears. The authors studied whether a very large AI language model can learn to shift its thinking process based on data from real scientists. They found a way to detect and control the AI's thinking style in the middle of its layers, allowing it to explore ideas, focus on following steps, or critically reassess results without changing the model itself. This new control method helped an AI system discover software vulnerabilities and design a rocket, showing that managing an AI’s reasoning steps can improve how it does scientific tasks.
Open → 2609.16245v1

Correct reduced coordinates improve modeling of aircraft flutter behavior

Floquet Fibre Geometry and Higher-Order Reduced Coordinates for Off-Manifold Transients near Nonlinear Aeroelastic Flutter

Abstract: Assigning reduced coordinates to states near an attracting limit cycle requires the correct invariant-fibre geometry. The classical first-order phase-isostable chart obtained from adjoint Floquet modes projects along the strong-stable quotient fibre, whereas a metric-orthogonal complement of the retained slow bundle generally does not. We prove locally that a chart satisfying the linearised semiconjugacy relation leaves an O(delta^2) invariance residual, while projection along a non-invariant complement generically leaves an O(delta) term. For a nonlinear aeroelastic limit cycle, the metric-normal and strong-stable directions differ by 48.5 to 71.7 degrees, and metric-normal perturbations contain first-order retained phase and slow-amplitude components. Replacing the metric normal by the strong-stable fibre changes the measured residual scaling from delta^1.01 to delta^1.87 without fitted parameters. We then test learned higher-order corrections whose linearisation is pinned to the adjoint-Floquet chart, whose symmetry is exact, and whose reduced flow is fixed. Although they reduce the registered fixed-normalisation latent residual, post-hoc amplitude recalibration and adjoint-Floquet-targeted future consistency move or reverse the ranking. Because the learned maps already share the baseline's first-order gauge and the future target is supplied by the baseline chart, these diagnostics establish neither an independent positive nor negative higher-order result. Correct first-order Floquet geometry is therefore necessary in this benchmark, while the additional predictive value of the learned correction remains unidentified by the available representation-dependent diagnostics.

Sun 13 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Understanding how airplane wings and parts flutter requires simplifying complex behavior into fewer variables. The authors show that picking these simplifications using the right geometric approach results in much smaller errors. They prove that the usual method leads to larger inaccuracies, while using a newer mathematical approach reduces these errors significantly. Attempts to improve on this with advanced corrections were inconclusive, showing the importance of the correct first step.
Open → 2609.14674v1

Piezoelectric transducer placement impacts energy harvesting from fluttering aerofoils

Transducer Placement and the Limits of a Four-State Reduced Model in Post-Flutter Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting from a Pitch-Plunge-Flap Aerofoil

Abstract: Aeroelastic ?utter is normally a failure mode to be designed against, yet the limit-cycle oscillations (LCOs) that follow it convert flow energy into sustained structural motion that a piezoelectric transducer can turn into electrical power. A transducer is embedded in a three-degree-of-freedom pitch-plunge aerofoil with a finite-mass trailing-edge flap and unsteady strip-theory aerodynamics, giving a fifteen-state electro-aeroelastic system with a cubic hardening pitch spring, and the system is reduced by biorthonormal projection of the Taylor-expanded residual onto eigenvectors of the coupled Jacobian. The testbed is deliberately low order, so that every reduced prediction can be checked against the full-order system it replaces. The degree of freedom that carries the transducer is a first-order design variable, since it sets both the sign of the shift in the flutter boundary and the magnitude of the harvested power. The error of the reduced model is dominated not by the size of the retained basis but by how the reduced operator is made to depend on low speed. Expanding the retained eigenvalues leaves the reduced operator block-diagonal, with no coupling between the retained modes at any order of the expansion, whereas re-projecting the exact Jacobian onto the same frozen basis supplies that coupling and restores the structural response without enlarging the basis. It is found that the error that remains lies in the harvested voltage, which the equilibrium eigenvectors carry in a fixed proportion to the motion, and this is not removed by adding the electrical modes to the basis, whereas the flap detection, which the same basis also misses, is recovered by retaining the flap modes. The accuracy of a harvester reduced-order model must therefore be reported on the harvested quantity itself.

Fri 11 SeptComputational Engineering, Finance, and Science
The gist
Fluttering in aircraft wings is usually a problem, but it creates steady motion that can be used to generate electricity with a piezoelectric device. The authors studied a wing model with three movements and a flap, adding a device that converts this motion into power. They found that where the device is placed changes how much energy can be harvested and affects when flutter starts. They also showed that simplified mathematical models need to be carefully designed to accurately predict the power output.
Open → 2609.12788v1

Improved turbine design optimization using mixed fidelity data

A Novel Multi-fidelity Surrogate for Turbomachinery Design Optimization

Abstract: Turbomachinery design optimization involves expensive black-box problems. Sample-efficient multi-fidelity optimization (MFO) offers an efficient solution. By utilizing multi-fidelity surrogates (MFS), the MFO algorithm can use fewer high-fidelity samples aided by low-fidelity samples to establish an accurate surrogate model. However, when MFS is used in sequential sampling optimization, it has been observed that the final optimal solution obtained by single-fidelity optimization (SFO) is better than that of MFO, even though MFO performs better at the early stages. This can be attributed to the assumption of an even and nested distribution of samples, which is incorrect when using a sequential adding strategy. To address these issues, we propose a novel algorithm called multi-single-fidelity optimization (MSFO) to overcome the limitations of the conventional MFO procedures. In the surrogate establishment of MSFO, we use the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) method to detect local areas where low-fidelity samples are no longer effective. A combination of both global MFS and local single-fidelity surrogate model, built using high-fidelity samples alone, is used to establish an ensemble, which improves the anti-interference ability of the algorithm against misleading low-fidelity data. The effectiveness of the MSFO algorithm is verified first on numerical benchmark functions. Then, the algorithm is used to optimize the aerodynamic profile of a turbine and the film cooling layout design of a turbine endwall. Here, high-fidelity sample sources are obtained from fine-mesh CFD simulations, whereas low-fidelity sample sources are obtained from the same simulations run on a coarser mesh. The results demonstrate that our MSFO algorithm performs significantly better than the conventional SFO and MFO processes, with a higher level of robustness.

Thu 10 SeptComputational Engineering, Finance, and Science
The gist
Optimizing the design of turbines is very costly because it relies on detailed computer simulations called high-fidelity models. The authors found that current methods using both cheap, rough models and expensive, accurate models sometimes fail to find the best design over time. They created a new method that combines global models using all data with local models using only the accurate data, detecting when the cheap data is not helpful. This new method works better and more reliably in tests, including real turbine design cases.
Open → 2609.11111v1

Graph models improve prediction of cylinder flow across regimes

ONE CYLinder: A Benchmark for Graph-Based Surrogate Modeling of Unsteady Bluff-Body Flows

Abstract: Graph-based surrogate models offer a promising route to accelerate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations on unstructured meshes. However, their development is limited by the scarcity of benchmark datasets spanning multiple flow regimes and standardized protocols for long-horizon autoregressive prediction. We introduce ONECYL (ONE CYLinder), a new benchmark for unsteady flow past a circular cylinder across laminar, transitional, and high-Reynolds-number regimes. The benchmark comprises 450 high-fidelity Variational Multiscale finite-element simulations (270,000 flow snapshots) with randomized cylinder geometries, providing time-resolved velocity and pressure fields together with mesh connectivity, geometric descriptors, Reynolds numbers, and integrated aerodynamic quantities. Beyond the dataset, ONECYL establishes a unified evaluation framework combining full-field rollout errors, virtual probes, and drag and lift predictions to assess numerical accuracy and physical fidelity. To accompany the benchmark, we develop a Graph Transformer as a reference baseline predicting velocity and pressure fields autoregressively on unstructured meshes. Using ONECYL, we investigate geometric representations and physics-based regularization across the three Reynolds-number regimes. The results show that explicitly encoding the cylinder geometry through a level-set representation consistently improves long-horizon prediction accuracy and generalization to unseen geometries, while divergence-based regularization becomes increasingly beneficial as flow complexity increases. The ONECYL benchmark and its Graph Transformer baseline provide a reproducible framework for evaluating graph-based surrogate models and establish a foundation for future research on long-horizon prediction of unsteady bluff-body flows.

Tue 8 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Simulating how air or water moves around objects like cylinders is important but often slow and complex. The authors created a large, detailed dataset capturing flow around cylinders with different shapes and flow speeds to help improve faster prediction methods. They also built a graph-based model that predicts these flows over time better by including shape information and physics rules. This work provides a common test setup and baseline to help others build better, faster tools for predicting fluid behavior around objects.
Open → 2609.08947v1