Papers for

aerospace control teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Quantile-based predictive control improves gimbal pointing accuracy

Quantile-Based Command-Reserve MPC for Current-Command Gimbal Pointing

Abstract: This paper studies the constrained line-of-sight pointing control problem of a two-axis current-command gimbal subjected to mismatched mechanical disturbances. Friction, torque ripple, current-response lag, model mismatch, and limited drive commands make accurate pointing more challenging yet interesting. A quantile disturbance predictor is proposed to compensate predictable acceleration residuals and describe their remaining uncertainty, with the aid of learning median and outer quantiles from state, command, and reference histories. A tube-inspired model predictive controller is proposed to reserve command headroom according to prediction uncertainty, with the aid of calibrated radii and stage-dependent input margins. The median improves the nominal prediction, while the radius adapts the command reserve without adding optimization variables. A finite-horizon tube inclusion result is established for a specified linear error model and fixed ancillary policy; its conditions are distinguished from the approximations used in hardware. Native command bounds and a final command limiter keep the sent commands within their prescribed range. On a two-axis embedded platform, four controller configurations are compared in seven repeated trials each. The proposed configuration achieves a two-dimensional pointing root-mean-square error of $3.94 \pm 0.10$ mrad with no command-limit samples in the evaluation windows. Its performance supports the combined use of residual prediction and adaptive command margins in the tested operating condition. Solver times and logged loop overruns are reported separately for the nominal 100 Hz implementation.

Mon 26 OctRobotics
The gist
Pointing a two-axis gimbal accurately is tough because of mechanical problems like friction and lag. The authors designed a way to predict and measure uncertain disturbances using quantiles, which helps adjust commands more reliably. Their controller keeps commands within safe limits while adapting to uncertainties. Tests on actual hardware show better pointing accuracy and reliable command use with their method.
Open → 2610.34913v1

Optimizing robot and system control with intrinsic manipulability measures

Fiber-Normalized Manipulability and Determinant Proxies: Intrinsic Redundancy Optimization Across and Within Task Fibers

Abstract: This work establishes that determinant-based manipulability is an exact objective for fixed-task redundancy optimization, despite its dependence on task coordinates and the choice of task-space metric used for volume measurement. On every regular task fiber, the determinant proxy, its representation in any task chart, and every metric-completed manipulability differ only by positive constants. They consequently induce the same complete ordering, constrained extrema, gradient directions, critical points, and local optimality classifications. For comparisons and trajectory optimization across task fibers, this work introduces fiber-normalized manipulability: the capability attained at an internal state divided by the best capability available on the same fiber. The resulting dimensionless scalar is invariant under coordinate changes on the internal-state and task manifolds and independent of the task-space metric. Its associated loss provides an intrinsic objective for physically admissible cross-fiber trajectories, including problems with prescribed or free task evolution and temporal coupling. Planar-manipulator and redundant aerodynamic-allocation examples demonstrate fixed-fiber equivalence, task-dependent cross-fiber differences, and invariant fiber-normalized trajectory optimization.

Fri 25 SeptRobotics
The gist
Measuring how well robots or systems can move or perform tasks can depend on how you look at the task, which is confusing. The authors show that a popular way to measure this ability, called determinant-based manipulability, actually gives consistent rankings even when you change how you describe the task. They also create a new measure, fiber-normalized manipulability, that compares performance within a task setup and stays the same no matter how you describe the task or system. This helps plan and optimize movements or controls both within the same task setting and across different ones.
Open → 2609.32079v1