Papers for

adaptive clinical trial designers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Conservative bandits improve uncertain policies with shared confidence

Reserve-Aware Contrast Certificates for Conservative Bandits with Uncertain Baselines

Abstract: Conservative bandits must improve an incumbent policy without exhausting a prescribed performance budget. When the incumbent is uncertain, separately bounding candidate and baseline rewards can charge twice for shared estimation error. We develop Reserve-C4B around the baseline-relative contrast itself. A shared confidence set yields an exact expression for this avoidable penalty and a tighter admissibility test at every fixed history. A reserve ledger separates statistical evidence from permitted performance deficit; a prefix-refresh extension recertifies accumulated decisions under the current confidence set without discarding previously certified credit. For linear rewards, self-normalized confidence sets provide simultaneous validity over time and adaptively generated candidates, and the resulting policy satisfies a conditional-mean performance constraint with high probability. Reproducible experiments isolate certificate coupling, prefix refresh, and historical information, showing large reductions in baseline fallback while exposing the limitations of frozen certificates.

Wed 30 SeptArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Sometimes computers try to improve a current strategy without making it worse by too much. But if they aren’t sure how good the old strategy really is, they can make mistakes by being too cautious. The authors figured out a better way to measure the difference between new ideas and the old one, using shared information to avoid paying twice for the same uncertainty. This method helps computers decide when it’s safe to try improvements while keeping risks low.
Open → 2609.39106v1

New method learns optimal choices in two-arm bandit problems faster

Elicitation and Decision Geometry in Single-Index Bandits

Abstract: We study two-arm contextual bandits with arm-specific single indices and a shared unknown monotone link. Monotonicity makes the optimal action depend only on the contrast between the index directions, hence arm-specific reward functions need not be estimated. We introduce Natural Boundary Learning (NBL), a greedy procedure that uses a sequential Stein contrast to learn the optimal boundary directly, without estimating the reward functions or the common link. We characterize the local Riemannian dynamics of NBL through a decision stability coefficient balancing arm separation, link geometry, and the context distribution. We show that this stability is connected to the elicitation geometry of the underlying convex potential. Under local decision stability, NBL contracts toward the optimal boundary and achieves $O(\log n)$ expected regret. Numerical experiments illustrate the predicted stability regimes and compare NBL with a parametric greedy benchmark under link misspecification.

Mon 28 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
This paper deals with a decision-making problem where you have two options, each with unknown rewards that depend on context. The authors develop a new method called Natural Boundary Learning (NBL) that learns the best choice directly without needing to estimate how each option behaves separately. They show that this approach quickly improves decisions over time by focusing on the boundary between the two options. Their analysis explains when and why the method works well, and experiments confirm these findings.
Open → 2609.35622v1

Linear contextual bandits achieve near optimal regret bounds with dynamic action sets

Nearly Minimax-Optimal Regret for Linear Contextual Bandits with Arbitrary Adaptive Action Sets

Abstract: We study stochastic linear contextual bandits with arbitrary action menus that may depend on the fixed parameter and the interaction history. We establish matching upper and lower bounds, up to logarithmic factors. Let $d$ be the dimension, $K$ be the menu size, and $T$ the time horizon. For $2\le K\le d$, we prove an upper bound $\widetilde O(K^{1/4}\sqrt{dT})$. When $T\ge d^2$, we further prove a lower bound $Ω(K^{1/4}\sqrt{dT})$. Thus, for $T\ge d^2$ and $2\le K\le d$, the upper and lower bounds match up to logarithmic factors, and the polynomial dependence on $K$ is optimal. Compared with the previous $\widetilde O(\sqrt{dKT})$ bound, our upper bound improves the dependence on $K$ by a factor of $K^{1/4}$. For $K\ge d$, we prove an upper bound $\widetilde O_{d,T}\left(\sqrt{dT}\min\{\sqrt d,(d\log K)^{1/4}\}\right)$ and a lower bound $Ω\left(\sqrt{dT}\min\left\{\sqrt d,\left(\frac{d\log K}{\log(2d)}\right)^{1/4}\right\}\right)$. Here, $\widetilde O_{d,T}$ omits logarithmic factors only in $d$ and $T$. In particular, for polynomially large $K\ge d$, the upper and lower bounds both scale as $d^{3/4}\sqrt T$ up to logarithmic factors, improving the standard $\widetilde O(d\sqrt T)$ rate by a factor of $d^{1/4}$. As $K$ grows further, the regret smoothly recovers the $d\sqrt T$ scale once $\log K$ reaches order $d$.

Mon 14 SeptMachine LearningComputer Science and Game Theory
The gist
This paper looks at a problem where a system must pick actions based on changing options and past results, aiming to do almost as well as the best fixed choice. The authors improved the understanding of how the size and complexity of choices affect the system's performance. They show that for many settings, their new method is close to the best possible, even when the options adapt based on past outcomes. This means better decision-making algorithms can be designed for complex, changing environments.
Open → 2609.15170v1